علوم، فناوری و کاربردهای فضایی

علوم، فناوری و کاربردهای فضایی

تبیین مدل کیفی پایه برای تاب آوری فضائی در معماری فضاهای کاری با محدودیت بالا (اتاق تمیز صنعتی)با رویکرد انسان محور

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه سمنان
2 دانشیار گروه معماری دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران
3 استادگروه معماری دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران
چکیده
مطالعات پیشین، ارتباط بین آسایش، سلامت و بهره وری را در فضاهای کار معمولی اثبات کرده اند. در فضاهای کاری خاص، مانند اتاق تمیز صنعتی، قابلیت تحمل برای کارکنان سخت تر می شود، زیرا استاندارد های سختگیرانه باعث محدود شدن دسترسی، تردد و محدودیت های شدید تعاملاتی و بصری، می شوند. هدف این پژوهش، یافتن راهی برای جبران این قبیل، کاستی ها در فضاهای یاد شده است. پژوهش حاضر از منظر هدف، اکتشافی و به لحاظ استفاده، کاربردی است و از نظر فنون گردآوری داده ها، کیفی. ابتدا مطالعات اسنادی در حوزه مفاهیم محوری، کیفیت فضا، ابعاد تاب آوری و مبانی نظری موضوع انجام شد، تا مولفه های موثر بر فضا و اهداف کیفی آن استخراج گردد. سپس، جهت گردآوری داده های میدانی، مصاحبه های عمیق با خبرگان حوزه های مربوطه، روش گروه متمرکز به کار گرفته شد. بر این اساس، آسایش بصری و آسایش صوتی، به ترتیب بالاترین تاثیر را در سازگاری محیطی جهت تامین مطلوبیت فضایی دارند؛ سازگاری ارگونومی و سازگاری حسی – عاطفی، در این خصوص با تاثیر متوسط و در اولویت پایین تر، ارزیابی شدند. نتیجه این که تامین آسایش بصری و صوتی، در شکل دهی به مدل کیفی مطلوبیت فضا های خاص مانند اتاق تمیز صنعتی پیشتاز هستند. نتایج حاصل از پژوهش به شکل یک الگوی جامع تحت عنوان " مدل یکپارچه انسان محور در تعامل بین تاب آوری فضای معماری و عوامل مطلوبیت فضا " شکل گرفت. با توجه به یافته های میدانی و گزاره های محتوایی استخراج شده، آسایش بصری دارای بیشترین میزان تاثیر گذاری بر میزان تاب آوری فضایی می باشد. نتایج پژوهش، در مقایسه با تحقیقات پیشین، نشان می دهد که در واقع، عامل "کامیابی" شدیداً متأثر از عامل "آسایش بصری" است. پژوهش، در نهایت، یک مدل چندوجهی برای تاب آوری فضایی در معماری فضاهای کاری با محدودیت بالا را پیشنهاد می کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

  1. Bluyssen, P., et al., AIRLESS: A European project to optimise indoor air quality and energy consumption of HVAC-systems. 2001.
  2. Godish, T., Indoor environmental quality. 2016: CRC press.
  3. Maleki, S.N., Design criteria for enhancing the vitality of residential areas, in Department of Architecture and Environmental Design, . 2013, Iran University of Science and Technology: iran.
  4. Küller, R. and C. Lindsten, Health and behavior of children in classrooms with and without windows. Journal of environmental psychology, 1992. 12(4): p. 305-317.
  5. Esteves, L. S., & Williams, J. J. (2017). Managed realignment in Europe: a synthesis of methods, achievements, and challenges. Living Shorelines, 157-182.

6          Whyte, W. (2010). Cleanroom technology:       fundamentals of design, testing and operation. John Wiley & Sons.

7               Pulwarty, R., et al., Risk to Resilience: Climate change, disasters and the WMO-UNDRR Centre of Excellence. Bulletin Nº, 2022. 71(1).

  1. Abi-Hashem, N., On cultural resiliency. The Australian Community Psychologist, 2011. 23(2): p. 23-31.
  2. Southwick, S.M., et al., Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: interdisciplinary perspectives. European journal of psychotraumatology, 2014. 5(1): p. 25338.
  3. Winwood, P.C., R. Colon, and K. McEwen, A practical measure of workplace resilience. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2013. 55(10): p. 1205-1212.
  4. Attaianese, E. Environmental Design and Human Performance. A Literature Review. in Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) Volume VIII: Ergonomics and Human Factors in Manufacturing, Agriculture, Building and Construction, Sustainable Development and Mining 20. 2019. Springer.
  5. Ostroff, E., Universal design: an evolving paradigm. Universal design handbook, 2011.
  6. Uyaroğlu, İ.D., Resilience in interior architecture education: Distance universal design learning in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 2021. 2(2): p. 234-249.
  7. Holl, S., House: Black Swan Theory. 2007: Princeton Architectural Press.
  8. Spence, C., Senses of place: architectural design for the multisensory mind. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2020. 5(1): p. 46.
  9. Verschaffel, B., The interior as architectural principle. Palgrave Communications, 2017. 3(1): p. 1-8.
  10. Lee, K., The Interior Experience of Architecture: An Emotional Connection between Space and the Body. Buildings, 2022. 12(3): p. 326.
  11. Cha, S., et al. Defect analysis and cost-effective resilience architecture for future DRAM devices. in 2017 IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA). 2017. IEEE.
  12. Vink, P., Comfort and design: principles and good practice. 2004: CRC press.
  13. Vischer, J.C., The concept of environmental comfort in workplace performance. Ambiente Construido, Porto Alegre, 2007. 7(1): p. 21-34.
  14. Bazley, C., et al., Interior effects on comfort in healthcare waiting areas. Work, 2016. 54(4): p. 791-806.
  15. Bluyssen, P.M., M. Aries, and P. van Dommelen, Comfort of workers in office buildings: The European HOPE project. Building and Environment, 2011. 46(1): p. 280-288.
  16. Vischer, J.C., Towards an environmental psychology of workspace: How people are affected by environments for work. Architectural science review, 2008. 51(2): p. 97-108.
  17. Kim, J. and R. De Dear, Nonlinear relationships between individual IEQ factors and overall workspace satisfaction. Building and Environment, 2012. 49: p. 33-40.
  18. Kim, J., et al., Gender differences in office occupant perception of indoor environmental quality (IEQ). Building and environment, 2013. 70: p. 245-256.
  19. Abbaszadeh, M., Study of intervening effect of environmental responsible attitude on the relationship of between place attachment and environmental responsible behavior. Journal of Applied Sociology, 2016. 27(2): p. 61-80.
  20. Herbig, B., A. Schneider, and D. Nowak, Does office space occupation matter? The role of the number of persons per enclosed office space, psychosocial work characteristics, and environmental satisfaction in the physical and mental health of employees. Indoor Air, 2016. 26(5): p. 755-767.
  21. Oldham, G.R. and N.L. Rotchford, Relationships between office characteristics and employee reactions: A study of the physical environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983: p. 542-556.
  22. Knasko, S.C., Ambient odor's effect on creativity, mood, and perceived health. Chemical senses, 1992. 17(1): p. 27-35.
  23. Wolkoff, P., T. Salthammar, and E. Woolfenden, Emission cells and comparison to small chambers for materials emissions testing. Gefahrstoffe-Reinhaltung der Luft, 2005. 65(3): p. 93-98.
  24. Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin, and S. Frampton, Healing spaces: elements of environmental design that make an impact on health. Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, 2004. 10(Supplement 1): p. S-71-S-83.
  25. D'Oca, S., et al., Introduction to an occupant behavior motivation survey framework. 2016.
  26. Frontczak, M., et al., Quantitative relationships between occupant satisfaction and satisfaction aspects of indoor environmental quality and building design. Indoor air, 2012. 22(2): p. 119-131.
  27. Yildirim, K., A. Akalin-Baskaya, and M. Celebi, The effects of window proximity, partition height, and gender on perceptions of open-plan offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2007. 27(2): p. 154-165.
  28. Heinzerling, D., et al., Indoor environmental quality assessment models: A literature review and a proposed weighting and classification scheme. Building and environment, 2013. 70: p. 210-222.
  29. Lee, T.K., S.H. Cho, and J.T. Kim, Residents’ adjusting behaviour to enhance indoor environmental comfort in apartments. Indoor and Built Environment, 2012. 21(1): p. 28-40.
  30. Bin, A.S. and A. Shmailan, The relationship between job satisfaction, job performance and employee engagement: An explorative study. Issues in Business Management and Economics, 2015. 4(1): p. 1-8.
  31. Lai, A., et al., An evaluation model for indoor environmental quality (IEQ) acceptance in residential buildings. Energy and buildings, 2009. 41(9): p. 930-936.
  32. Humphrey, S.E., J.D. Nahrgang, and F.P. Morgeson, Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of applied psychology, 2007. 92(5): p. 1332.
  33. Astolfi, A. and F. Pellerey, Subjective and objective assessment of acoustical and overall environmental quality in secondary school classrooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2008. 123(1): p. 163-173.
  34. Wong, S.C.-k. and J.S. Li, Will hotel employees’ perception of unethical managerial behavior affect their job satisfaction? A study of Chinese hotel employees in China. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 2015. 27(5): p. 853-877.
  35. Frontczak, M. and P. Wargocki, Literature survey on how different factors influence human comfort in indoor environments. Building and environment, 2011. 46(4): p. 922-937.
  36. Marans, R.W. and X.-y. Yan, Lighting quality and environmental satisfaction in open and enclosed offices. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 1989: p. 118-131.
  37. Veitch, J.A., et al., A model of satisfaction with open-plan office conditions: COPE field findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2007. 27(3): p. 177-189.
  38. Choi, Y. and D.R. Dickson, A case study into the benefits of management training programs: Impacts on hotel employee turnover and satisfaction level. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 2009. 9(1): p. 103-116.
  39. Schakib-Ekbatan, K., A. Wagner, and C. Lussac. Occupant satisfaction as an indicator for the socio-cultural dimension of sustainable office buildingsdevelopment of an overall building index. in Proceedings of Conference: Adapting to Change: New Thinking on Comfort. 2010. Network for Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings (NCEUB) Windsor.
  40. O’Connell, D., et al., A Resilience Checklist–a Guide for Doing Things Differently and Acting Collectively (Resilience Checklist Version 1.0 July 2020). 2020, Canberra: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation ….
  41. Khormaee, F., Focus Groups. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2007. 13(52): p. 67-81.
  42. Elo, S. and H. Kyngäs, The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 2008. 62(1): p. 107-115.
  43. shahbazmoradi, s.s., mohamadreza, Management and advanced models of human resources (concepts and models of strategic approach, human capital and human resources architecture). 2013, Tehran, iran: Tofighe Danesh. 5.
  44. Kallio, H., et al., Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 2016. 72(12): p. 2954-2965.
  45. Danaee Fard, H.k., hosein, Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches, ed. 4. Vol. 1. 2016, Tehran, Iran: Mehraban Publishing Institute. 22.
  46. Flick, U., The SAGE handbook of qualitative Research Design. 2022: Sage.54.
  1. Creswell, J.W. and J.D. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 2017: Sage publications.

  • تاریخ دریافت 26 اسفند 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 05 خرداد 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 23 تیر 1403