Experimental investigation of supersonic diffuser starting performance in conical nozzle test with different area ratio

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Nematollah Fouladi 1
Mohammad Farahani 2
AhmadReza Parsa Delivand 2
1 Space Transportation Research Institute, Iranian Space Research Center
2 Department of Aerospace Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Azadi Street, P.O. Box: 11365-11155, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/jssta.2024.437401.1149
Abstract
One of the most important parameters in the operation of the diffuser of the vacuum simulator is the ratio of the cross-sectional area of the diffuser inlet to the outlet cross-section of the nozzle. Increasing this parameter increases the expansion length of the supersonic flow and causes instability in the process of starting up the diffuser. In the present study, the effect of the different diffuser inlet to nozzle exit area ratio (Ad/Ae) on the starting performance of a second throat exhaust diffuser has been investigated experimentally. Vacuum simulation tests have been carried out on several conical nozzles with different exit area by a high-pressure air apparatus. Investigations show that at high Ad/Ae before starting the diffuser, oscillations in the pressure of the test chamber are created due to the instability of the flow at the diffuser inlet. By frequency analysis of the vacuum chamber pressure, it is observed that as Ad/Ae increases, the number of oscillatory modes of the vacuum chamber pressure increases and the dominant frequency of the oscillations before starting the diffuser becomes larger. It was also observed that, generally, with the increase of Ad/Ae the amount of motor pressure corresponding to the start of oscillations decreases. In addition, according to the investigations, with the increase of Ad/Ae from 1.27 to 7.81, the minimum starting pressure of second throat exhaust diffuser increases by 20.33 %.
Keywords
Second throat exhaust diffuser# High altitude test facility# Starting performance# Conical nozzle# Flow instability
Subjects
[1]    P. Ducasse, “Rocket altitude test facilities register,” ADVISORY GROUP FOR AEROSPACE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT NEUILLY-SUR-SEINE (FRANCE), 1987.
[2]    J. N. Sivo, C. L. Meyer, and D. J. Peters, Experimental Evaluation of Rocket Exhaust Diffusers for Altitude Simulation. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1960.
[3]    B. H. Park, J. Lim, S. Park, J. H. Lee, and W.-S. Yoon, “Design and Analysis of a Second-Throat Exhaust Diffuser for Altitude Simulation,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1091–1104, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.2514/1.B34342.
[4]    B. H. Park, J. H. Lee, and W. Yoon, “Studies on the starting transient of a straight cylindrical supersonic exhaust diffuser: Effects of diffuser length and pre-evacuation state,” International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1369–1379, Oct. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.04.006.
[5]    N. Fouladi, “Numerical investigation of flow transient phase of motor burnout in an altitude test simulator,” Modares Mechanical Engineering, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 10–19, Nov. 2018.
[6]    K. Annamalai, K. Visvanathan, V. Sriramulu, and K. A. Bhaskaran, “Evaluation of the performance of supersonic exhaust diffuser using scaled down models,” Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, p. 13, 1998.
[7]    J. Lim, B. H. Park, W. Yoon, and Y. Lee, “Parametric Investigation on the Essential Flow Factors Commanding Steady Operations of the Second Throat Exhaust Diffuser,” in 44th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Hartford, CT: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Jul. 2008. doi: 10.2514/6.2008-4784.
[8]    H.-G. Sung, H.-W. Yeom, S. Yoon, S.-J. Kim, and J. Kim, “Investigation of Rocket Exhaust Diffusers for Altitude Simulation,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 240–247, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.2514/1.46226.
[9]    R. Arun Kumar and G. Rajesh, “Flow transients in un-started and started modes of vacuum ejector operation,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 28, no. 5, p. 056105, May 2016, doi: 10.1063/1.4948959.
[10]  R. Arun Kumar and G. Rajesh, “Physics of vacuum generation in zero-secondary flow ejectors,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 30, no. 6, p. 066102, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1063/1.5030073.
[11]  N. Fouladi, M. Farahani, and A. R. Mirbabaei, “Performance evaluation of a second throat exhaust diffuser with a thrust optimized parabolic nozzle,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 94, p. 105406, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.105406.
[12]  N. Fouladi and M. Farahani, “Numerical investigation of second throat exhaust diffuser performance with thrust optimized parabolic nozzles,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 105, p. 106020, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.106020.
[13]  N. Fouladi, “Numerical investigation of back flow arrester effect on altitude test simulator starting performance,” Modares Mechanical Engineering, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 185–196, 2017.
[14]  N. Fouladi, A. Mohamadi, and H. Rezaei, “Numerical design and analysis of supersonic exhaust diffuser in altitude test simulator,” Modares Mechanical Engineering, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 159–168, Oct. 2016.
[15]  H. L. Merryman and R. M. Brooksbank, “Quality Assurance Test of a Thiokol Chemical Corporation TE-M-364-3 Solid-Propellant Rocket Motor Tested in the Spin Mode at Simulated Altitude Conditions,” ARO INC ARNOLD AFS TN, 1970.
[16]  R. Manikanda Kumaran, K. Vivekanand, T. Sundararajan, S. Balasubramanian, and D. Raja Manohar, “Analysis of Diffuser and Ejector Performance in a High Altitude Test Facility,” in 45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Denver, Colorado: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Aug. 2009. doi: 10.2514/6.2009-5008.
[17]  E. Mohammadi, N. Fouladi, and A. Madadi, “Design and Analysis of Gas Ejector in High Altitude Test Facility,” Amirkabir Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 3015–3032, 2019.

  • Receive Date 24 January 2024
  • Revise Date 12 March 2024
  • Accept Date 05 June 2024