Document Type : selected article

Authors

1 Imam Khomeini International University - Buin Zahra Higher Education Center of Engineering and Technology

2 Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies, University of Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the orbital characteristics of a constellation consisting of 24 LEO satellites. All the configurations are based on the Walker Delta model, which include single- regulated (one constellation) and double- regulated (intertwined two constellations) models. For the sake of comparability, it is assumed that the orbital period of all satellites is 127 minutes and regarding the maximum altitude of 2000 km, the three eccentricities of zero (circle), 0.19 (with an apogee of 2000 km) and 0.097 (=0.19/2) with the longest presence time on the mission area, are considered. In order to limit the search space, the inclination of all orbits is assumed 40 degrees and three values of 320, 340 and 360 degrees are considered for the argument of perigee in elliptical orbits. Examining the various scenarios, it can be seen that, Assuming the need for at least two observable satellites, basically, it can be found that for the argument of perigee of 320 degrees provides the best coverage beside the least standard deviation. As expected, the higher eccentric orbits perform better regardless of changes in signal strength. on the other hand, Double-regulated configurations can be associated with a larger number of satellites in view, which generally is accompanied by higher standard deviations. In General, a configuration may be chosen according to mission requirements and no one should be regarded as the absolute optimum.

Keywords

Main Subjects

## M. Sweeting, “Modern small satellites-changing the economics of space,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 343–361, 2018.##
## D. Arnas, D. Casanova, and E. Tresaco, “Time distributions in satellite constellation design,” Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 197–219, 2017.##
## I. del Portillo, B. G. Cameron, and E. F. Crawley, “A technical comparison of three low earth orbit satellite constellation systems to provide global broadband,” Acta Astronaut., vol. 159, pp. 123–135, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.040.##
## T. Wu, S. Wu, and L. Zhu, “Design of common track satellite constellations for optimal regional coverage,” in 2006 6th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications, 2006, pp. 1252–1255.##
## N. Pachler, I. del Portillo, E. F. Crawley, and B. G. Cameron, “An Updated Comparison of Four Low Earth Orbit Satellite Constellation Systems to Provide Global Broadband,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), Jun. 2021, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/ICCWorkshops50388.2021.9473799.##
## S. D. Ilcev, Global Mobile Satellite Communications: For Maritime, Land and Aeronautical Applications. Springer Science & Business Media, 2005.##
## D. Martin, P. Anderson, and L. Bartamian, Communication Satellites, 5th edition. El Segundo, California : Reston, Virgina: AIAA, 2007.##
## J. G. Walker, “Continuous whole-earth coverage by circular-orbit satellite patterns,” Royal Aircraft Establishment Farnborough (United Kingdom), 1977.##
##  L. Rider, “Optimized polar orbit constellations for redundant earth coverage,” J. Astronaut. Sci., vol. 33, pp. 147–161, 1985.##
## K. Park, M. P. Wilkins, and D. Mortari, “Uniformly distributed flower constellation design study for global navigation system,” 2004. ##
##  J. Zhang, F. Deng, X. He, L. Li, and L. Zhang, “Designing LEO retrograde orbit satellite constellation for regional coverage,” in 22nd AIAA International Communications Satellite Systems Conference & Exhibit 2004 (ICSSC), 2004, p. 3159.##
## D.-M. Ma, “Regional positioning system using low earth orbit constellations,” Acta Astronaut., vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 387–394, 2006.##
##R. L. Galski, “Preliminary Design of Satellite Constellations for a Brazilian Regional Positioning System by Means of an Evolutionary Algorithm,” J. Aerosp. Eng., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 52, 2012.##
## D.-M. Ma, Z.-C. Hong, T.-H. Lee, and B.-J. Chang, “Design of a micro-satellite constellation for communication,” Acta Astronaut., vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 54–59, 2013.##
##S. Wu, X. Zhao, C. Pang, L. Zhang, and Y. Wang, “A new strategy of stochastic modeling aiming at BDS hybrid constellation in precise relative positioning,” Adv. Space Res., vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 2757–2770, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2018.04.007.##
## X. He and U. Hugentobler, “Design of Mega-Constellations of LEO Satellites for Positioning,” in China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2018 Proceedings, May 2018, pp. 663–673. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-0005-9_54.##
## F. Ma et al., “Hybrid constellation design using a genetic algorithm for a LEO-based navigation augmentation system,” GPS Solut., vol. 24, no. 2, p. 62, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10291-020-00977-0.##
## H. Curtis, Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students: Revised Reprint. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2020. ##
## D. Arnas and D. Casanova, “Nominal definition of satellite constellations under the Earth gravitational potential,” Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., vol. 132, no. 3, pp. 1–20, 2020.##
## M. N. Pachery and M. R. Bhatnagar, “Double differential modulation for LEO-based land mobile satellite communication,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 3339–3346, 2020.##
## G. Maral, J.-J. de Ridder, B. G. Evans, and M. Richharia, “Low earth orbit satellite systems for communications,” Int. J. Satell. Commun., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 209–225, 1991.##
## S. Cakaj, B. Kamo, A. Lala, and A. Rakipi, “The coverage analysis for low earth orbiting satellites at low elevation,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 5, no. 6, 2014.##